Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6249
    Peter
    Participant

    Dan,

    It is beyond sad! First Shuetz is not entitled to represent 13000 SCA Members; His position requires and demands an SCA Director to be our ACC Board member; Also, Orlov is the director at large for a 2nd Term…..not allowed; At the end of his term the position was required to be announced to all members and they could reply to be considered.

    The Sad man ignores that Shuetz is not an honest person in his dealings with members. Karrow refused to act or consider my request to have him removed as a Director at ACC. In fact she stated in her letter to me, all Board members had discussed the matter and agreed with her response. That is not true.
    I don’t read the Sad man’s blog or post there, the reason is he is not interested in a real discussion or the facts. I do intend to write the SCA Board regarding this matter.

    Peter Brown

    #6061
    Peter
    Participant

    Dick,

    Well said but too kind to these six stooges( SCA Board of Directors).

    In my opinion the last Board was dishonest(Karrow; Shuetz; Coleman; Quinn; Hadrick) yet sadly this current Board is so inept, afraid, spineless and without intellect it is frightening!

    Yes, no current member of this Board or the prior Board should ever be on the SCA Board again or in any other function for this community. This should be the focus of our community.

    I am so tired of this Board saying that their goal is transparency; communication and honesty; that is only if SCA Legal Counsel allows after they kiss his ring. 

    Peter Brown

     

    #6060
    Peter
    Participant

    Dan,

    Agree 100%! What a joke!

    I have multiple experiences with SCA Board where they have flat out lied.

    It is amazing to me this Board would make such empty accusations against community members with blogs. Though I agree in the case of the sad little man (berman).

    Further the “lies” or false statements by this group during their bid for election is pathetic.

    Plus to make such statements about Rana and your blog is truly sad; suggesting not to listen to their former president. These 6 Board members are clueless and inept.

    Peter Brown

    #5924
    Peter
    Participant

    In general I agree with Ms. Kosterka’s comments. I intended to post my thoughts and will do soon. I plan to address the ineptness of our Board in allowing the SCA attorney (Clarkson), to orchestra their thoughts and decisions.

    Also, Mr. Hicks approach would require you to accept your attorneys “opinion” and instructions as the gospel. As a practicing CPA I have worked with 100’s of attorneys on my behalf and clients, for now let me simply indicate the majority of the attorneys were simply not good attorneys or incompetent.

    As time allows I will elaborate further ASAP.

    Peter Brown

    #5868
    Peter
    Participant

    Dan,

    Well said! To be honest I have heard the name Ron Johnson, but I don’t know who or what he is; Apparently he writes a blog, fortunately I am not aware of it and have no interest in reading it. In addition, I quit reading, visiting or posting on the other bloggers (sad little man) site, he has no credibility or integrity in my opinion.

    It continues to amaze me these “Senior Adults” in our community have so little in their life, that your personal matters is where they choose to spend their time.

    Personally I wouldn’t give anyone your trust document or anything else, next they will want your tax returns. It is simple, you and Rana are a couple and a presence in our community, certainly you are a greater member of SCA than the thousand of homeowners who do not participate, do not vote and so on.

    Peter Brown

    #5658
    Peter
    Participant

    To Rana and Dan,

    First let me say you both have my support and confidence. The previous post by a Bernie H. seems incoherent and off the point. Yes, we all have a “story”, yet it is not the issue or purpose at hand. This Board of SCA that promised transparency, communication and honesty has become a pathetic group of “scared” fools without integrity or purpose.

    perlstein is a joke and failure and hasn’t earned the right to suggest anything about Ms. Goodman; further his only purpose was the restaurant survey, “hell of a job so far”!

    The remaining Board of pope, quinn, hadrick, Linow and anderson are truly inept and have not seriously done their job or even attempted to keep their promises as they suggested when they ran for office.

    Rana, you don’t deserve or need this group and they certainly don’t deserve you. Be assured you are better off disassociated from this “pack” of misfits.

    I look forward to your extended remarks and I wish you and Dan success and good health. Finally, I look forward to Dan’s approach and success with his new blogs to add to his “ communication” empire.

    Peter Brown

     

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)