Home › Forums › Where I Stand › Let ALL The SCA Members Vote, Restaurant, YES/NO! › Reply To: Let ALL The SCA Members Vote, Restaurant, YES/NO!
Sorry to sound like the broken record over and over, but the meeting for our choices was a near disaster. As I have mentioned, theonly option for a restaurant vendor is to have the “TRIPLE NET LEASE.” It exculpts us from all the total insanity we have seen the last four times. It allows us to have a “ARMS LENGTH TRANSACTION” and ends all the problems down the road we have dealt with in the past.
Oh sure, I heard the comments of having another fancy restaurant, but in reality it hasn’t worked in the past and I can’t think of anything that will make it work in the future. You know that the eventual fact is if the restauranture isn’t making what they expected, they’ll cheapen up on the quality of the food, again as we have seen.
Oh, as to G2G, apparently they own Coco restaurants, and as at least one person commented, “there is no consistancy in their food offerings, and we’ll see people complaining of that (and I for one can attest to that too).
I know the board is not happy about who came and what they wanted, and I’d bet they are still lookng for other vendors…but it isn’t going to happen.
Too bad!
Make it something else. I’m sure our over paid General Manager (you know, the one that makes about $60K more than the new GM of the city of Henderson can come up with something EVERYBODY wants)!