Reply To: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FUMBLING FINANCIAL THINK TANK

Home/Reply To: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FUMBLING FINANCIAL THINK TANK

Reply To: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FUMBLING FINANCIAL THINK TANK

Home Forums Where I Stand ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FUMBLING FINANCIAL THINK TANK Reply To: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF OUR FUMBLING FINANCIAL THINK TANK

#3195
Anonymous
Inactive

What (or Who) is JJD ?

 

JJD is a shortened term For “ JANE OR JOHN DOE” that is used in the following article.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LAS VEGAS SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND THE HENDERSON SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND WHY THE SCA LAWYERD PREFER THE LATTER ?

If you have ever utilized the services provided at the Las Vegas Small Claims Court you know the process. They are a busy place and the State employs many employees that register and record the complaints and applications for Small Claims Court dates.

 

The Las Vegas Small Claims Court DOES NOT employ an JJD’s because when you submit your Small Claims papers AND YOUR EXHIBITS they are immediately scanned into a file that is presented to the assigned Judge for his consideration. In just a day or two you will receive an Email with the attached file that you can access on your computer. ALL the files AND exhibits that were submitted are made available to you as well as the Judge before the trial date is determined.

You wont know the assigned Judge until later when you are notified via Email, but the Judge has access to all the files and all exhibits filed by the defendants AND BY the plaintiff and he/she examines BOTH before the trial date.

It doesn’t work that way in The Henderson Small Claims Court. There they employ JJD’s to record all the papers and exhibits that you present bring to the Henderson Small Claims Court. The Documents and the Exhibits submitted ARE NOT scanned into a computer when they are received and you will not be able to download those files on your computer later.

In the Henderson Small Claims Court system ALL the documents and ALL the Exhibits that are presented to the assigned Judge is decided by a JJD. In my case the only documents and the only exhibits that were submitted to the Judge for his consideration were the documents submitted by the SCA lawyers. NONE of the documents and exhibits I submitted were turned over to the judge for his consideration before he pronounced his decision.

* JJD withheld my lawyers sworn testimony regarding Jack Troia and his violation of my Civil rights to “Due Process“.

* JJD withheld Rana Goodman’s testimony that proved I did not “POKE” anyone.

* JJD withheld ALL the emails and other exhibits that were presented and discussed in the mandated Mediation Process.

* JJD withheld the published Result of the completed Dispute Resolution that was signed by myself, Sandy Seddon (CAM) and two SCA lawyers.

* JJD withheld The Completion Certificate issued by the State of Nevada declaring that I had complied with all Nevada Statutes and was entitled to a Civil Court Hearing.

* JJD withheld the DATE when a Case was opened AFTER the Completion Certificate was issued.

 

JJD SAW TO IT THAT THE ONLY DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS THAT WERE VIEWED AND CONSIDERED BY THE HENDERSON JUDGE WERE THE DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS SUBMITTED BY THE SCA LAWYERS.

My advice to anyone who has been victimized by their HOA in Henderson is this. DO NOT RELY ON THE HENDERSON STAFF TO SUBMIT YOUR FILES AND/OR PLEAS TO THE ASSIGNED JUDGE. Instead I would suggest that you send them via certified mail RRR to the “Judge Assigned to Case No (insert Case No.). and don’t loose the post office receipt after delivery.